Target for major new QL hardware

Nagging hardware related question? Post here!

What is your preferred target for major new QL hardware?

Standalone machine (Q60/Q68 philosophy)
23
30%
QL extension slot plugin (GoldCard philosophy + graphics)
17
22%
QL mainboard replacement (Aurora philosophy + CPU/RAM)
22
29%
Miniaturized module for tinkering (Qzero philosophy*)
14
18%
 
Total votes: 76

User avatar
RalfR
Aurora
Posts: 872
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: Target for major new QL hardware

Post by RalfR »

Amazing!


4E75 7000
User avatar
dilwyn
Mr QL
Posts: 2761
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:39 pm

Re: Target for major new QL hardware

Post by dilwyn »

Thank you Peter. Do keep us informed of progress with this.


Silvester
Gold Card
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 10:14 am
Location: UK

Re: Target for major new QL hardware

Post by Silvester »

Looks good, I have a spare QL case that has been unused for far too long :)

BTW I just did a quick scale of image and aligned it with bare issue 6 PCB. Is the MDV extension cover insertion OK against P17 ?


David
User avatar
Peter
Font of All Knowledge
Posts: 2017
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 8:47 am

Re: Target for major new QL hardware

Post by Peter »

Silvester wrote:Looks good, I have a spare QL case that has been unused for far too long :)
Thanks. Unfortunately, I don't... still looking for an empty QL case.
Silvester wrote:BTW I just did a quick scale of image and aligned it with bare issue 6 PCB. Is the MDV extension cover insertion OK against P17 ?
Well spotted. ;) Yes it should be okay, I placed the board edge a little more to the left than the original for that reason.
Unfortunately the space consumption of the matrix keybiard converter did not allow me to place the Qzero (which sits on P17) more to the left. And board width 100 mm was my personal upper limit for standalone use. Would have been cool to actually use that extension slot for something.


User avatar
Peter
Font of All Knowledge
Posts: 2017
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 8:47 am

Re: Target for major new QL hardware

Post by Peter »

This is how the prototyping PCB for my new QL mainboard looks:
tmp.jpg
Before some get too optimistic: It won't support the microdrives, which will be replaced by SD card "drives". However, the original microdrive LEDs and the corresponding internal connector will be supported, to preserve as much as of the look & feel as possible.


afx
Trump Card
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 10:23 pm

Re: Target for major new QL hardware

Post by afx »

Peter wrote:This is how the prototyping PCB for my new QL mainboard looks:
tmp.jpg
Before some get too optimistic: It won't support the microdrives, which will be replaced by SD card "drives". However, the original microdrive LEDs and the corresponding internal connector will be supported, to preserve as much as of the look & feel as possible.
Looks great! :o ... very compact.

I think it's going to be a very significant development for the QL. It will certainly be "life insurance" for our QLs for many years to come.

By the way, how is the QL keyboard connected? (I don't distinguish the QL's membrane keyboard connectors).


User avatar
Peter
Font of All Knowledge
Posts: 2017
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 8:47 am

Re: Target for major new QL hardware

Post by Peter »

afx wrote:By the way, how is the QL keyboard connected? (I don't distinguish the QL's membrane keyboard connectors).
P4 and P18 allow direct connection. The keyboard cables can be angled to the right and are then just long enough. I would recommend a replacement membrane, because it is more robust.

Ideally, the board should be one inch wider to make handling the keyboard cables easier. But I set myself the 10 cm board size limit for standalone use, and according to my measurements it should be okay. When the boards and components arrive, I will test in practice.

I'm curious how the hybrid approach of using a QL baseboard plus the Qzero as CPU module will work out. On one hand it means extra costs and work. Two boards are always more expensive than one, and more connectors are required. On the other hand it adds flexibility. Like going without Qzero and attaching a Q68 inside the QL case. Or others designing baseboards in different form factors.


afx
Trump Card
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 10:23 pm

Re: Target for major new QL hardware

Post by afx »

Peter wrote:I'm curious how the hybrid approach of using a QL baseboard plus the Qzero as CPU module will work out. On one hand it means extra costs and work. Two boards are always more expensive than one, and more connectors are required. On the other hand it adds flexibility. Like going without Qzero and attaching a Q68 inside the QL case. Or others designing baseboards in different form factors.
That hybrid approach of using the CPU in a separate module is very interesting and clever. In addition to taking advantage of the development of Q68/QZero, could it open the door to other modules such as the Pi Zero? (of course as long as there are people who can develop the software).


User avatar
Dave
SandySuperQDave
Posts: 2778
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:52 am
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: Target for major new QL hardware

Post by Dave »

I’m just hoping for a decent expansion connector. A low profile 3.5” drive would fit perfectly in the expansion bay.


User avatar
bwinkel67
QL Wafer Drive
Posts: 1202
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2019 2:09 am

Re: Target for major new QL hardware

Post by bwinkel67 »

Oh wow, we could finally have a QL with a built-in disk drive.


Post Reply