Re: GitHub - QL Sources
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:43 pm
The are broken link (404 error)
Per,pjw wrote:Im not sure I like the way Git thinks, or messes with my stuff. (Im pretty sure God didnt write the world in C as the assumption seems to be over at GitHub!) I uploaded a small test project but it didnt turn out the way I wanted. But its early days and perhaps Im merely banging my head against the learning wall (or maybe it is just a steep curve afterall). I hope its possible to hide the embarrassing stuff later when I get wise..
Dont get me started, Norman Lets just say its down to irreconcilable differences, going back all the way to the early days of the QL.. I dont want to start a small war, so my half page of gripe has been deleted for everyone's benefitNormanDunbar wrote:Per,pjw wrote:Im not sure I like the way Git thinks, or messes with my stuff. (Im pretty sure God didnt write the world in C as the assumption seems to be over at GitHub!) I uploaded a small test project but it didnt turn out the way I wanted. But its early days and perhaps Im merely banging my head against the learning wall (or maybe it is just a steep curve afterall). I hope its possible to hide the embarrassing stuff later when I get wise..
In what manner does git mess with your source code? It's not all c on github, I've got ReStructuredText for the online SuperBASIC manual, I've got c++, I've got c, I've got Java (yuk) and I've got ANTLR4 up there too. I've had no problems with it.
I'd be interested to know what's bugging you!
If you are still looking, you could start by using my BBEdit / Text Wrangler file. It might be easy to convert to TextMate? Never used TextMate so I have no idea.RWAP wrote:
We need some system of getting github to recognise SuperBASIC as a language - having spoken to them, you need an open source Textmate-style language grammar defining for it to get it added.