Is the Registrar aware of this move? Were any of the copyright holders asked, or even informed of this in advance? (I know I wasnt) Apart from the possible convenience, what are the implications, positive or negative? Hmm.. The license you chose for your work says you don't care as long as your nam...

I already have the GPD Win which is similar size but with keyboard.

It does make a nice portable QL and does fit nicely in pocket.

It was part of my reason for the Windows port of uQlx.

Pr0f wrote:The QL does UEFI ?

No, but it also doesnt care about MBR boot sector either

I guess this is the wrong forum to say no-one cares about boot sector anymore, UEFI doesn't use it

(waits to be pelted by the greybeards)

Another possibilty to create and access QLWA containers under Linux and Windows is qxltool: http://www.zen35309.zen.co.uk/qdos/#qxltool By the way, does someone have a comprehensive mirror of this important QL website? Just remember on linux to compile it for 32bit, under 64bit it looks like it wor...

dilwyn wrote:Many thanks to both of you for this, I've updated my own settings now too.

Now all I need to work out is why Firefox takes 3 minutes to log me into this Forum sometimes (Chrome and IE both OK, although Firefox is what I use most now).

Stop swearing at it in Welsh

and I guess if SMSQmulator is running faster than the 2nd fastest QL type machine ever made, is there a point investing a lot of time into uQlx running SMSQ/e?

Dave wrote:Any possibility of uQLx growing to support SMSQ/E?

Its more the other way round who will write the SMSQ/E drivers for uQlx?

Dave wrote:
Haven't ever been able to get uQLx to work at all.

That should work, Swensons distro was developed on Pi0